Preventing Renewed Violence
in Rwanda: A Program for Leaders
Ervin Staub
Laurie Anne Pearlman
USIP-109-01S
The purpose of this project is to reduce the
likelihood of renewed violence and to improve relations between ethnic groups
in Rwanda. The work consists of individual interviews and seminars with groups
of leaders in Rwanda.
In August 2001, we met with a group of
high-level leaders for a four-day
seminar. Their numbers varied from 25-35 during the four days, since they had
varied obligations that they had to attend, for example, meetings of the
Parliament. Before the seminar, we met individually with several leaders (e.g.,
the director of a Rwandese human rights umbrella organization, the director of
the Rwanda prison system, the executive secretary of the Rwandese Unity and
Reconciliation Commission) to learn their views on the current situation and
their perspectives on how the seminar might be most useful.
The seminar attendees included both Hutu and
Tutsi leaders; members of parliament, religious leaders, the president of the
national human rights commission, commissioners of the Unity and Reconciliation
Commission, the director of the electoral commission, leaders of local NGOs,
the vice president of the supreme court, the secretary general of the ruling
party, etc. Seminar topics discussed in the first three days included the
origins and prevention of genocide and mass violence and psychological trauma
and healing. In addition to lectures and extensive discussions, participants
had the opportunity, for shorter periods during days two and three, and for a
longer period on day 4, to work in small groups to explore particular issues in
greater depth and consider relevant current practices in Rwanda. The small
groups summarized their discussions in a brief report to the large group, which
then discussed the report.
The attached summary of the seminar shows
the rich dialogue that ensued when we addressed the above topics. Participants
actively engaged with the ideas concerning the origins and prevention of group
violence. The most striking conversations were those related to three issues:
(1) the meaning of "group" (see attached leaders seminar summary);
(2) the importance of a shared collective memory, a history of the Rwandese
people acceptable to both groups; and (3) the upcoming gacaca, or community
justice, process.
Participants were positive about the seminar
after its completion. They encouraged us to collaborate with them in sharing
the information from the seminar with the larger population in the hope and
belief that it might help prevent renewed violence and retraumatization of the
population during the gacaca process. Working in collaboration with the
University of Massachusetts Center for International Education, as well as with
a Dutch TV/radio producer (since part of the vision is to create radio programs
that help the Rwandese people to understand and deal with trauma and to help
them understand the roots of violence and thereby mitigate renewed hostility
that may arise from hearing testimonies of great violence in the course of the
gacaca process), we have been exploring possible avenues for assisting in the
gacaca process.
At this time, Rwandese leaders are deeply
engaged in the gacaca process, in developing a new constitution and in moving
toward national elections. We plan in our continuing work with leaders to focus
on several aspects of the prevention of new violence. At this time, these
include ways to create a shared history acceptable to both groups, and what the
leaders might do in the course of the gacaca process, which will extend for
several years, to make it into an avenue for reconciliation. Our tentative date
for our next visit to Rwanda is June 2002.
leadership project, January 2002 interim
report to USIP.doc
January 10, 2002